Home / Resources / Website review template
TemplateWebsite review template
Work through your own site one section at a time, tick what is true, and write a note for everything that is not. At the end, pick the three fixes that matter most. Items that cite a source say so; the rest are good practice, not guarantees.
Before you start
| Site address | |
|---|---|
| Reviewer and date | |
| Type of business (restaurant, shop, service, other) | |
| The one thing a visitor should do (book, buy, call, visit) |
For a longer explanation of each point, read the website review checklist guide.
1. The basics: pages and ownership
2. Titles and headings
3. Content
4. Speed on a phone
Google's web.dev guidance (last updated 2024-10-31) defines three Core Web Vitals and calls these values "good": Largest Contentful Paint at 2.5 seconds or less, Interaction to Next Paint at 200 milliseconds or less, and Cumulative Layout Shift at 0.1 or less, each measured at the 75th percentile of page loads. See Core Web Vitals in plain English.
5. Accessibility basics
The W3C's WCAG 2.2 guidance (understanding documents updated 2026-09-06) asks for text alternatives for images and charts (success criterion 1.1.1), and a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text at level AA (1.4.3). See accessibility basics.
6. Search visibility
7. Notes and fix list
| Priority (1 to 3) | What is wrong | Which page | Who fixes it | Done on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Pick the three highest-priority fixes, do them, and repeat the review in a few months. If you are hiring help, hand over the web designer brief. To track results over time, use the monthly tracking sheet.
Sources (all accessed 2026-10-21):
- Google Search Central: influencing your title links (updated 2025-12-10)
- web.dev: Web Vitals (updated 2024-10-31)
- W3C: Understanding SC 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (updated 2026-09-06)
- W3C: Understanding SC 1.1.1 Non-text Content (updated 2026-09-06)
- Google Search Central: sitemaps overview (updated 2025-12-10)
Everything not tied to a source above is common good practice. This is general information, not legal advice. Want a hands-on review? See the free program.